simon
The Tall Man
Posts: 201
Gender:
Last Online: Feb 3, 2014 5:43:50 GMT -8
|
Post by simon on Feb 20, 2012 14:37:45 GMT -8
First off, I'd like to say I enjoyed the Rob Zombie remake of Halloween. Having said that, here's why the original is far superior, and why Rob Zombie should have followed the original more closely.
In the remake, we see Michael growing up in this nasty, abusive, dysfunctional white trash family, which is the director's way of explaining how Michael became psychopathic. What Rob Zombie didn't understand, (much like post-Carpenter Halloween directors before him), is that a lack of explanation is exactly what makes Myers so scary in the first place.
If we see Michael as a child in a house full of malice, hatred and violence, then we can point to that as the cause of his psychopathy. It gives us something we can understand as a reason why he became a stone cold killer. Sure, that's pretty scary, but it's nowhere near as scary as having no explanation at all.
In the original, Michael Myers was an ordinary little kid, from an ordinary family, living in an ordinary little town...and one Halloween night, he just picked up a huge knife, and brutally murdered his sister with it. Just like that. Nobody saw it coming. Nobody could have predicted it. And there was no explanation. It was just random chaos, an act of absolute evil, which Loomis' dialogue stresses over and over again. The Shape is "evil on two legs". Evil doesn't need a reason or a justification; it just does horrible, horrible things.
THAT is scary. It means that an evil force just welled up inside this kid and lashed out, without warning or provocation. And it could happen to any of us.
|
|
Jason
Murderator
The Crypt Keeper
Posts: 12,380
Gender:
Favorite Films: Clue, Unforgiven, Friday the 13th Part IV
Last Online: Nov 21, 2024 23:28:06 GMT -8
|
Post by Jason on Feb 20, 2012 15:40:08 GMT -8
I wanted to like Zombie's remake. But after multiple viewings, it still doesn't do it for me. I can't get past the white trash family. It just seemed far too out of place for Michael and the Halloween franchise. I know it's a reboot, but it felt more like another House of 1,000 Corpses or Devil's Rejects movie. Not to mention his adult version of Michael is a direct rip off of Jason. Freakishly huge, zombie looking madman who looks like he crawled out of a grave. His visions of his mother that fuel him to keep killing. That's pretty much what solidified my dislike in it.
|
|
simon
The Tall Man
Posts: 201
Gender:
Last Online: Feb 3, 2014 5:43:50 GMT -8
|
Post by simon on Feb 21, 2012 5:58:56 GMT -8
Yeah, the Jason-esque portrayal of Michael isn't so great either. (It was also not cool how they Jasonized Leatherface in the TCM remake...but that's another kettle of body parts). I took into account that Rob Zombie likes to be larger-than-life, so I could look past the super-sized Michael, but the whole "he sees ghosts" thing in Zombie's H2 was just unforgivable.
With the first movie, Zombie established that there was nothing supernatural about Myers; he's just a psychopath. Fine, if that's the way Zombie wanted to go, ok sure. But don't veer into the supernatural with the second movie! Make up your mind, Rob.
|
|
mtc1998
Jason Voorhees
Posts: 868
Gender:
Last Online: Aug 4, 2013 17:30:17 GMT -8
|
Post by mtc1998 on Feb 21, 2012 14:54:30 GMT -8
1000 houses of coarpes was not bad
|
|
Jason
Murderator
The Crypt Keeper
Posts: 12,380
Gender:
Favorite Films: Clue, Unforgiven, Friday the 13th Part IV
Last Online: Nov 21, 2024 23:28:06 GMT -8
|
Post by Jason on Feb 21, 2012 16:13:36 GMT -8
I heard there was a 3rd in the works, but Zombie won't be directing. The remakes have already gone to shit, I don't see a possibility of it being saved. I'm just glad that they're sequels to the remake, and not a Halloween II remake, etc..
|
|
mtc1998
Jason Voorhees
Posts: 868
Gender:
Last Online: Aug 4, 2013 17:30:17 GMT -8
|
Post by mtc1998 on Feb 21, 2012 19:27:31 GMT -8
there was 3?
|
|
simon
The Tall Man
Posts: 201
Gender:
Last Online: Feb 3, 2014 5:43:50 GMT -8
|
Post by simon on Feb 24, 2012 5:53:35 GMT -8
Damn it. They need to just leave these movies alone. John Carpenter & Debra Hill got it perfect the first time; no sense in trying to fix what ain't broken.
|
|
mtc1998
Jason Voorhees
Posts: 868
Gender:
Last Online: Aug 4, 2013 17:30:17 GMT -8
|
Post by mtc1998 on Feb 24, 2012 20:23:43 GMT -8
yeah, maybe squeals aren't so bad
|
|
Jason
Murderator
The Crypt Keeper
Posts: 12,380
Gender:
Favorite Films: Clue, Unforgiven, Friday the 13th Part IV
Last Online: Nov 21, 2024 23:28:06 GMT -8
|
Post by Jason on Feb 24, 2012 20:54:18 GMT -8
All this does is prove how much better film making was back then.
|
|
simon
The Tall Man
Posts: 201
Gender:
Last Online: Feb 3, 2014 5:43:50 GMT -8
|
Post by simon on Feb 25, 2012 4:41:05 GMT -8
All this does is prove how much better film making was back then. Generally, yes. Directors back then made "horror" films in the old sense of the word, i.e. dread, as opposed to modern directors who seem to want to just test how strong the audience's stomach is. Examples of excellent horror films that would probably have been much less memorable if they'd been made 20 or 30 years later: The Changeling, The Shining, The Exorcist, A Nightmare on Elm Street...oh wait.
|
|